He Tohu 膧rahi - Guidelines for Protecting Cultural Intellectual Property in Research and Innovation (2024)
K Riddle, M Hudson, N Kusabs, R Sterling
He Tohu 膧rahi serves as a starting point for in-depth discussions for Indigenous people involved in research and innovation projects. It provides guidance around the conversations to have, provisions required, and protection mechanisms for m膩tauranga M膩ori within research and their various associated agreements.
Approaches to Benefit Sharing Summit video launching He Tohu 膧rahi Guidelines
You can also watch and share the .
He Tohu 膧rahi - Guidelines for Protecting Cultural Intellectual Property in Research and Innovation
K Riddle, M Hudson, N Kusabs, R Sterling (2024) 
He Tohu 膧rahi serves as a starting point for in-depth discussions for Indigenous people involved in research and innovation projects. It provides guidance around the conversations to have, provisions required, and protection mechanisms for m膩tauranga M膩ori within research and their various associated agreements.
Download He Tohu 膧rahi Guidelines for Protecting Cultural Intellectual Property in Research and Innovation
You can also watch and share the .
Te Nohonga Kaitiaki - Guidelines for Genetic Research on Taonga Species (with background)
M Hudson, A Thompson, P Wilcox, J Mika, C Battershill, M Stott, R Brooks, L Warbrick. (2023)
Te Nohonga Kaitiaki refers to the role of kaitiaki and mana whenua in managing M膩ori interests in biological samples or genetic resources, and data relating to taonga species across the full spectrum of activities from sample collection to sample storage, from data curation to data sharing. On behalf of Te Nohonga Kaitiaki team, the following video is an outline of new guidelines for genomic research on taonga species that have emerged from a Genomics Aotearoa funded research project (presented by Maui).
Download Te Nohonga Kaitiaki
Watch the
Te Nohonga Kaitiaki - Guidelines for Genetic Research on Taonga Species
Te Nohonga Kaitiaki - Guidelines for Genomic Research on Taonga Species. M Hudson, A Thompson, P Wilcox, J Mika, C Battershill, M Stott, R Brooks, L Warbrick
Te Nohonga Kaitiaki refers to the role of kaitiaki and mana whenua in managing M膩ori interests in biological samples or genetic resources, and data relating to taonga species across the full spectrum of activities from sample collection to sample storage, from data curation to data sharing.
He Tangata Kei Tua: Guidelines for biobanking with M膩ori.
He Tangata Kei Tua: Guidelines for biobanking with M膩ori. M Hudson, A Beaton, M Milne, W Port, K Russell, B Smith, V Toki, L Uerata, P Wilcox. (2016)
This document outlines a framework for addressing M膩ori ethical issues within the context of biobanking. It draws on a foundation of m膩tauranga (Indigenous knowledge) and tikanga M膩ori (M膩ori protocols and practices) and will be useful for researchers, ethics committee members and those who engage in consultation or advice about biobanking with M膩ori in local, regional, national or international settings.
He Tangata Kei Tua: Guidelines for Genomic Research with M膩ori.
Te Mata Ira: Guidelines for genomic research with M膩ori. M Hudson, A Beaton, M Milne, W Port, K Russell, B Smith, V Toki, L Uerata, P Wilcox. (October 2016)
This document outlines a framework for addressing M膩ori ethical issues within the context of genetic or genomic research. It draws on a foundation of m膩tauranga (M膩ori knowledge) and tikanga M膩ori (M膩ori protocols and practices) and will be useful for researchers, ethics committee members and those who engage in consultation or advice about genomic research with M膩ori in local, regional, national or international settings.
Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for M膩ori Research Ethics
Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for M膩ori Research Ethics. A framework for researchers and ethics committee members. M Hudson, M Milne, P Reynolds, K Russell, B Smith. (2010)
Research contributes to the broader development objectives of society. Ethics has a specific role in guiding key behaviours, processes and methodologies used in research. International codes of ethics such as the Nuremburg Code (1947)2, the Helsinki Declaration (1964)3, the Belmont Report (1979)4 and, more recently, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005)5 shape the changing ethical standards and professional expectations for researchers.